From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3498dd887729ed19
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Garbage Collection in Ada
Date: 1996/10/23
Message-ID: <JSA.96Oct23185724@alexandria>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 191600388
sender: news@organon.com (news)
references: <01bbb910$f1e73f60$829d6482@joy.ericsson.se>
organization: Organon Motives, Inc.
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.846048434@merv> dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:

> iJon Anthony says
> 
> "You're being sloppy - you mean I may be part wrong in claiming that
> implementing all the annexes may not have had "that level of payback".
> I am clearly not wrong in claiming Orbix/Ada offers functionally
> everything (and more) than the DSA.  I can guarantee that.  I had the
> choice and have opted for the ORB.  Further, I am not wrong in stating
> that I don't have this sort of option for GC."
> 
> No, that's wrong, they are overlapping capabilities, sure, but it is not
> the case that Orbix/Ada offers functoinally all that DSA offers, but i
> will let the GLADE DSA folks elaborate on this ...

Well, as I have said elsewhere - I've not seen or heard anything that
would make your "denial" true.  I again say that DSA is a smallish bit
of the core of CORBA and has nothing to do or say with all the large
amounts of the rest of the OMA.  IOW, you are still wrong.

/Jon

-- 
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com