From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1014db,9adfbb907494972e X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,9adfbb907494972e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Ada to C/C++ translator needed Date: 1996/10/02 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 186757490 sender: news@organon.com (news) references: <32499FA0.4B5E@magic.fr> <52e5t5$m28@btmpjg.god.bel.alcatel.be> organization: Organon Motives, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <01bbaef3$73605680$87ee6fce@timpent.a-sis.com> "Tim Behrendsen" writes: > All that having been said, I wonder how much bounds checking > is actually kept in a real good-sized project where you are > passing general values into subroutines that get used as > array indexes (where the compiler couldn't necessarily validate > at compile time)? Perhaps you have not seen the other posts. If you are so inclined you can field the software with "all" checks removed. Sure, in most circumstances this makes little to no sense, but if that is what you want just do it. /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. 1 Williston Road, Suite 4 Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com