From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ccb707f4c91a5f2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Java vs Ada 95 (Was Re: Once again, Ada absent from DoD SBIR solicitation) Date: 1996/10/16 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 189909147 sender: news@organon.com (news) references: <325D7F9B.2A8B@gte.net> organization: Organon Motives, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article dale@rmit.edu.au (Dale Stanbrough) writes: > I think Interfaces are a _very_ nice feature. What makes you think the _capability_ is not available in Ada via child packages? /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com