From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,7f8fc37d854731d6
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f8fc37d854731d6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,7f8fc37d854731d6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,7f8fc37d854731d6
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 10461e,7f8fc37d854731d6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10461e,public
From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony)
Subject: Re: Interesting but sensitive topic to discuss (HELP: - OOP and CASE
 t
Date: 1996/11/08
Message-ID: <JSA.96Nov8152508@alexandria>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 195347248
sender: news@organon.com (news)
references: <32813322.41C6@kyebek3.kjist.ac.kr>
organization: Organon Motives, Inc.
newsgroups: 
 comp.object,comp.lang.ada,comp.ai,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk
Date: 1996-11-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <6KRKVf9k3RB@herold.franken.de> jhd@herold.franken.de (Joachim Durchholz) writes:

> alovejoy@concentric.net wrote 06.11.96:
> 
> > Objects are objects, not classes.
> 
> Of course :)
> 
> > OO programs are systems of interacting **objects**, not systems of
> > interacting **classes**.
> 
> I think this is a bit misleading.
> OO program texts are definitely systems of classes (or, rather, textual  
> representations of classes). We don't specify a single objects when  

I see that "all the world is a class" view has clouded your
perceptions! :-).  Not all OO (languages,systems,programs,etc) are
class based.


/Jon
-- 
Jon Anthony
Organon Motives, Inc.
Belmont, MA 02178
617.484.3383
jsa@organon.com