From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ccbce6c5ad05bfd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@organon.com (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Can OO be successful in real-time embedded systems? Date: 1996/05/09 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 153966814 sender: news@organon.com (news) references: organization: Organon Motives, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-05-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article "Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." writes: > anyone in the group do run-time dispatching. I know that I could buy a > compiler with the Safety and Security Annex. However, that is ridiculous > over-kill. You have provably heard my line, that Ada 95 is the Safety and > Security annex of C++. First one switches a C or C++ developer to Ada 95, > then, latter on, one can start discussion of the Safety and Security Annex. Why "overkill"? BTW, you can just download a compiler that supports the Safety and Security Annex - Gnat... /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. 1 Williston Road, Suite 4 Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com