From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea4f04ec8d41f5b7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@organon.com (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Ada83 equivalents for Ada95 Date: 1996/05/28 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 157220023 sender: news@organon.com (news) references: organization: Organon Motives, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-05-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <31A66DAA.7418@sud.ed.ray.com> Joe Gwinn writes: > If Ada83 is any guide, it will be three years before Ada95 reaches > anything like Ada83's present level of maturity. Ada83 took more like Well, since this is wrong, I guess your guide is poor... This really is a misleading and confusing statement at best. I have been using Ada95 on real stuff for over a year under Gnat. We are also looking into the Thompson ObjectAda for NT (though we have not yet used this, information indicates that it is pretty much "there"). What platform are you using? If it is VMS, then, yes, I suppose you will not get something until the VMS port of Gnat that ACT is doing for Digital is released. Otherwise, IMO, you are just plain in the weeds - big time. /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. 1 Williston Road, Suite 4 Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com