From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,99ab4bb580fc34cd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@organon.com (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Q: access to subprogram Date: 1996/07/15 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 168366144 sender: news@organon.com (news) references: organization: Organon Motives, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-07-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > iJon said > > "As several have pointed out, this is not particularly convincing. The > best evidence indicates that this was a red-herring in this instance." > > Nope, this was not a red herring, it (the concern about backend > reimplementation) was the major focus of the argument. Remember that I agree that this was the major focus of the argument. My claim is that IMO this was an irrelevant distraction and thus a red herring. /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. 1 Williston Road, Suite 4 Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com