From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d95b511473b3a931 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d95b511473b3a931 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,d95b511473b3a931 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: jsa@organon.com (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Language Choice and Coding style Date: 1996/07/02 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 163225464 sender: news@organon.com (news) references: organization: Organon Motives, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++ Date: 1996-07-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <4r7cnq$g57@sun.quiknet.com> rahill@mind.net (Russel A Hill) writes: > In article , jsa@organon.coms says... > >OKAnyParticularReasonWhyYourPostIsNotInThisSortOfSquashedTextStyleThatYou > >ThinkReadsSoMuchBetter? > > Get a life Jon. I type this way because it commnitactes well. Out compiler > Technology isn't suuffieicently advbanced to handle: > Loop Control Variable = Initial Value Um, I think you need to lighten up a bit - my comment was tongue in cheek. I really didn't think it needed a smiley. BTW, you are wrong that compilers can't handle variable names (e.g.) that are composed with blanks. Why do you think otherwise? > Unless you propran in FORTRAN, of course. But that has its own drawbacks. Nope, not only Fortran (which is not a particularly good example) > you were to code the following on my project I'd fire you on the spot. > > Loop_Control_Variable_For_Iterating_Whosit_Through_Whatchamacallit = 1 So? What's the relevance in this context? > Hyperbole has it's place, so long as you hit the mark. You missed... /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. 1 Williston Road, Suite 4 Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com