From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e29c511c2b08561c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@organon.com (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered? Date: 1996/07/12 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 168085450 sender: news@organon.com (news) references: <9606212019.AA11075@eight-ball> <4rrrvg$j9b@rational.rational.com> organization: Organon Motives, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-07-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <4s38g3$f8n@felix.seas.gwu.edu> mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman) writes: > Anyone who's followed the aftermath of the ValuJet tragedy has got to > be raising serious questions about the competence of this agency to > do _anything_, especially given its "dual mandate" to both enforce > air safety _and_ promote the aviation industry. Decades ago we > separated the two roles in the nuclear area, and ought to do so here > too. These fartknockers do not and positively _have not_ promoted aviation for quite sometime. They promote the _airline_ industry, which is _quite_ a different thing. /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. 1 Williston Road, Suite 4 Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com