From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f07b9c63c348974b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1008e3,f07b9c63c348974b X-Google-Attributes: gid1008e3,public From: jsa@organon.com (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: A comparison of Ada and Modula 3 Date: 1996/02/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 140402869 sender: news@organon.com (news) references: <4f48un$scs@nntpa.cb.att.com> organization: Organon Motives, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.modula3 Date: 1996-02-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article adaworks@netcom.com (AdaWorks) writes: > In embedded real-time systems, automatic garbage collection can be > a serious liability... >... > Langauges that consistently do automatic garbage collection will not > perform correctly in embedded, hard, real-time (HRTS) weapons systems. > They work fine, though, for desk-top systems in which safety is not an > issue. I hope you doned your nomex suit before sending this out! :-) /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. 1 Williston Road, Suite 4 Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com