From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,59f7ca851a394aa3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Reasons NOT To Choose Ada Date: 1996/12/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 202629219 sender: news@organon.com (news) references: <32872161.19FE@eurocontrol.fr> organization: Organon Motives, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-12-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <1996Dec4.190401.1@eisner> kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) writes: > In article , dmiller@cybo.com (Dana Miller) writes: > > In article <57vknm$r3c@news.structured.net>, cts@alpinet.com (Craig > > Spannring) wrote: > > >> You might want to check out Object Ada from Thompson. They have some > >> sort of visual layout program in their professional edition. I > >> haven't tried it out since I'm being paid to do C++ and $595 is a bit > >> steep for a toy to use at home. > > > > MS VC++ is ~$600 and CodeWarior for the Mac is ~$400 > > Unless it is very well hidden, Codewarrior does not include a visual > layout program. AppMaker from Bowers does an excellent job and will > interoperate with CodeWarrior (Pascal or C*), but the total price is > then up to the $600 level. I don't consider that horrible, but it > is not particularly lower than ObjectAda for Windows on Intel. Another point worth mentioning in this context is that the $595 price for ObjectAda is for the _professional_ version (even includes ClearCase CMS for crying out loud). The _personal_ version (which doesn't look too toy like either) is $245. As pointed out below, to get a _professional_ level MSVC++ is over the $1000.00 mark (last I looked) - and I _believe_ the compiler is the same piece of rubbish as what you get for the $600.00. > > The Professional or Enterprise versions of MSVB or MSVC++ are closer to > > four figures than two. Iwas just looking at the prices for MS software > > all across the board. WOW they are EXPENSIVE!! The alsys^h^h^h^h^h > > Thompson compiler is a good deal when you considder the cost of adding > > bounds checker $??? and possibly several other checkers $??? needed to do > > what Ada does out of the box. Not a bad deal. The other advantage of the > > Thompson product is that the definition of Ada95 is not as likely to > > change over the next year as C++ is (was) and force you to keep buying new > > compilers from MS or Borland. > > Yes, rather than torture programmers with frequent language changes > the Ada community prefers to torture purchasing agents with frequent > company and product name changes. ObjectAda is now from a company > called Aonix. Formerly Thomson. Former Alsys. Yeah, really! Criminey, I was just getting used to "Thomson"... /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com