From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,2f84446733b06aca X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,2f84446733b06aca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony) Subject: Re: Converting C++ class to Ada Date: 1996/12/18 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 204827969 sender: news@organon.com (news) references: <32ADF183.7195@lmtas.lmco.com> organization: Organon Motives, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ Date: 1996-12-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <32B05137.733A@lmtas.lmco.com> Ken Garlington writes: > However, will I be able to update the discriminants? Norman Cohen points No. > out that I could have an updatable copy within the record, but Yup. > that seems a little clumsy. I would tend to agree. > Also, if I wanted to make sure that "null" wasn't used as one of the > discriminants, would I have to use "access Motor.Object_Type" rather > than the declared access type? Neither will prevent that. /Jon -- Jon Anthony Organon Motives, Inc. Belmont, MA 02178 617.484.3383 jsa@organon.com