From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4bb12335caa3231a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.8.135 with SMTP id r7mr17625087pba.8.1318684559889;
        Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 d5ni11116pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 08:15:58 -0500
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:15:50 -0400
From: "Peter C. Chapin" <PChapin@vtc.vsc.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Enjoying the new syntax of Ada 2012
References: <4e9832e6$0$6571$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <64a4947f-7480-4cd8-9e6f-ed15e6fdf4ed@p1g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <64a4947f-7480-4cd8-9e6f-ed15e6fdf4ed@p1g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <JL-dnRavK70SGgTT4p2dnAA@giganews.com>
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: 
 sv3-lXNKxY95kyRLK2+IEydquzPnq+DBA74Qq/8cpevG1zZ09jRlfpzMRYU6V5GwCk1o7AAkXxjCTyIqSwt!aUfxMntijVQlLwd8a544qj5OnaC/bHIBe0e8Nfi46pruGxuWwjDbVH/D51sw+OU=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1598
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18475
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2011-10-15T09:15:50-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2011-10-14 09:18, okellogg wrote:

> You take away some of my happiness about Ada being comparatively
> easier to read ;)

It isn't that strange looking if you are used to a functional language 
that makes an expression out of everything. One could argue that isn't 
the Ada way, however, but the syntax seems fine to me.

Peter