From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aa8786249f0c751f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!a6202946!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Organization: jrcarter commercial-at acm [period | full stop] org User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How difficult is ada to learn? References: <1120092264.749327.16210@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 05:39:53 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.3.209.6 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net 1120196393 67.3.209.6 (Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:39:53 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:39:53 PDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11801 Date: 2005-07-01T05:39:53+00:00 List-Id: chris wrote: > > Not very. I found it easy to learn from a pascal background, so you > should have no problem. The US Military Academy (West Point) did a controlled study that concluded that Ada was a better 1st language than Pascal. Presumably that means Ada's easier to learn than Pascal. -- Jeff Carter "We call your door-opening request a silly thing." Monty Python & the Holy Grail 17