From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7dbba1cd16d32bb8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: anon@anon.org (anon) Subject: Re: Ada OOP syntax Reply-To: anon@anon.org (anon) References: <_9adnb1KYvIrW87VnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@comcast.com> <8rm5k.48565$102.1684@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <1213598007.755542@xnews001> X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:26:17 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.65.48.138 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1213734377 12.65.48.138 (Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:26:17 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:26:17 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:752 Date: 2008-06-17T20:26:17+00:00 List-Id: Novell owning the "copyright" does not mean they own UNIX. Just like GNU owning the "copyright" to GNAT does not mean they own GNAT Ada. Actually the company I am talking about owns at least of 5%, purchased back in 1994/5 and anyone that owns even one party can say they own it. It just that Novell owns by a Judges decision the controlling interest. But the purchase limits some of there rights on both sides. And the name "UNIX" is own by someone else. Even Novell admit that. Besides the owners of the "Copyright" there is: "Intellectual Property" of UNIX which a list of companies such as the old AT&T labs, SUN, SGI, IBM, NOVELL, etc own a part. And the company that I call the "current owners", has some "Intellectual Property" in UNIX as well. Then there are the "Patents" and that's a larger group of companies which include the list of "Intellectual Property" and including companies like Microsoft with its additions to XENIX, Exxon who owns Zilog and their version on UNIX. etc. And there are others topic as well that can calm ownership to some or all of of any routine or language. Including the group that wrote the language use in creating the software. So dude, the best way is not to argue about it. In <1213598007.755542@xnews001>, Dirk Heinrichs writes: >anon wrote: > >> From the licensing agreement with Novell that Judge Kimball did not over >> turn, what I called current owner of UNIX are the ones that can sell UNIX >> to a third party, such as SUN and Microsoft. > >Being allowed to sell something doesn't mean they own it. Novell owns Unix, >nobody else does. > >> Also at the movement Novell is playing with a couple of versions of SuSE >> Linux. > >??? > >Bye... > > Dirk >-- >Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 >Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 >Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: dirk.heinrichs@capgemini.com >Wanheimerstraße 68 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com >D-40468 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 >GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: wwwkeys.pgp.net