From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a875d9649dde34e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny09.POSTED!da342007!not-for-mail From: "stephane richard" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <2004100313293637709%david@bottoncom> Subject: Re: AdaPower and GWindows community effort drive X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 02:21:28 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.44.79.112 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trndny09 1096856488 129.44.79.112 (Sun, 03 Oct 2004 22:21:28 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 22:21:28 EDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4638 Date: 2004-10-04T02:21:28+00:00 List-Id: "Stephen Leake" wrote in message news:mailman.177.1096855957.390.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org... > I'd still like to pursue setting up a Claw or GWindows project at > Sourceforge, for code maintenance and development. > > -- > -- Stephe > Agreed here, the website could be maintained by a group. GWindows or CLAW, I believe would be better managed through SourceForge simply because it's made for it. Better control over what can go in it, easier ability to go back to a version should an added feature stops other parts from working properly. SourceForge and CVS are just made for this kind of code maintenance. I still don't see a problem in simply putting both of these on sourceforge. As I said I think they both have their own specific set of advantage and minding that I think different developers from different worlds would and could get used to depending on their respective backgrounds. :-)