From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f4cdd9ccfb8ede X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f849b,857262ad7d0ad537 X-Google-Attributes: gidf849b,public From: tmoran@bix.com Subject: Re: How many different processors do you use? Date: 1999/06/10 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 487758972 References: <7jmr4i$1c1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net 928985512 207.214.212.175 (Wed, 09 Jun 1999 20:31:52 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 20:31:52 PDT Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded,comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-06-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > > If you think an international standard can be achieved any > > quicker than it was, you just don't know how standards proceed. > > FYI, the Ada standard process was FAR FAR faster than the C > > or C++ processes. > > Perhaps the offical process was, but there were C compliers out before > the sign off. Its that true of Ada 95? I have a set of floppies here labeled "Janus/Ada 9X 386 Extender Ver 3.0.3" with a "most recent file" date in March 1993. I was using it for commercial (ie not toy, not research, not defense) work.