From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,54c513170bafd693 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Desirability of C++ Date: 2000/05/01 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 617911292 References: <01HW.B4BFC2820005B06B08A24140@news.pacbell.net> <87euk0$c93$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <01HW.B4C1346100072D2408A24140@news.pacbell.net> <949867976.281549@the-rowan.albatross.co.nz> <8766v93w66.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> <38E8C81A.AA62CF4C@HiWAAY.net> <7EA1B852F5D4D8C6.26EEE9181C8Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam X-Trace: news.decus.org 957200877 13647 KILGALLEN [216.44.122.34] Organization: LJK Software Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <390D9E0C.9C28DAD6@netwood.net>, "E. Robert Tisdale" writes: > Pat Rogers wrote: > >> > Does it matter? The fact is that >> > more programmers are learning and using C++ than Ada. >> >> Cite references, please. Otherwise you are propagating myth. > > It isn't necessary to cite an authority > when you can determine the truth of the statement > directly through observation. That observation has to be quite painstaking, as I don't think anyone should rightly count those who are programming in C but using a compiler capable of C++.