From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-04 07:48:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:48:52 -0600 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:49:43 -0500 From: Wes Groleau Reply-To: groleau@freeshell.org Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Clause "with and use" References: <3FA2CDCB.500F4AF0@fakeaddress.nil> <3FA3B412.AF3BEB96@fakeaddress.nil> <3FA6D275.924D5750@fakeaddress.nil> <1067951806.729117@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> In-Reply-To: <1067951806.729117@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.9.86.110 X-Trace: sv3-3cHAd0fOtlsY50JPXxtwx788JOU69Yt9eK+hk5EVHfZqK8y19U0Z6qyl4MN4HaGbX5PdJwgxchSa1rT!0vQygCWIKpFh5qyr2FpkTO0ysuAkxQuTqQIdSllQ7HfW8AqM1HJ7Cs2GFf9uTRXVSWTHz1whR+pa!Og== X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2049 Date: 2003-11-04T10:49:43-05:00 List-Id: Hyman Rosen wrote: > the things in the with clause. That means every time you > see a with/use set, you must verify that the packages in > both are in fact identical, and if they are not, figure Wrong. Every time I WRITE a with/use set, I need to make sure I write what I mean. I 'with' everything I will be referencing. I 'use' ONLY those that are less readable if fully qualified. Every time I _see_ a with use set, I hope that the author did the same thing. -- Wes Groleau "Grant me the serenity to accept those I cannot change; the courage to change the one I can; and the wisdom to know it's me." -- unknown