From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,20b3b2fc48674108 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-03 16:04:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Preferred method for bringing in operators References: <9ht50b$dk6$1@nh.pace.co.uk> X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 23:04:08 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.7.82.199 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com 994201448 24.7.82.199 (Tue, 03 Jul 2001 16:04:08 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 16:04:08 PDT Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9404 Date: 2001-07-03T23:04:08+00:00 List-Id: >I have attempted - deriving tagged types from Ada.Finalization.Controlled. >I'm using Gnat 3.13p and have had trouble mixing this with various stream >operations. (What would appear to be legal & workable when it *doesn't* >derive from Finalization ends up crashing when it *does* derive from >Finalization.) I'm wondering if you have experienced similar troubles and if Crash how? I haven't noticed any problem (yet) - what should be avoided?