From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,54672440f4ffc24b,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.isc.org!sjc1.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!nf3.bellglobal.com!nf1.bellglobal.com!nf2.bellglobal.com!news20.bellglobal.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Sandro Magi Subject: Invalid operator name? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: KNode/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Message-ID: Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 11:23:04 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.95.123.133 X-Complaints-To: abuse@sympatico.ca X-Trace: news20.bellglobal.com 1101572584 65.95.123.133 (Sat, 27 Nov 2004 11:23:04 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 11:23:04 EST Organization: Bell Sympatico Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6553 Date: 2004-11-27T11:23:04-05:00 List-Id: When I try to define my own operator, I receive an "Invalid operator name" error during compilation. I've found references to operator overloading in reference materials, but no word whether new operators can be defined which leads me to believe that it's not possible. Is it not possible to define new operators for a custom type? Can we only override the base operators?