From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e4bb8b12e1ce0d1f,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-02 02:35:56 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!convex!news.duke.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ROO.FIT.EDU!HARBAUGH Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: Date: Sat, 1 Oct 1994 23:13:00 EDT Sender: Ada programming language Comments: W: Incorrect or incomplete address field found and ignored. From: Simtel20 Transfer Subject: Is Ada the Future? Comments: To: INFO-ADA@VM1.NoDak.EDU Date: 1994-10-01T23:13:00-04:00 List-Id: I read in Information Week that Bill Gates says that he has $500M invested in Windows NT product family. I used to think that the $30M or so that the DoD out into Softech's original Ada effort was a lot of money and should have been enough. But now after reflection and considering the $500M for an operating system maybe a new language system, namely Ada 9X, needs > $500M to begin to make it commercially viable. Do we have the $500M+ to put into a new commercial programming language system? I doubt if the DoD does. Ok, I'll speculate that Ada 9X needs about $750M invested over the next several years to make it a commercial success. Agree? Disagree? sam harbaugh HARBAUGH@ROO.FIT.EDU p.s. just the team Ada uniforms will cost a considerable amount of money :-)