From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a046ce7f5ee1fa51 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-05 14:40:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: new_line in a put_line References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net 1039128040 12.234.13.56 (Thu, 05 Dec 2002 22:40:40 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 22:40:40 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 22:40:40 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31475 Date: 2002-12-05T22:40:40+00:00 List-Id: > > Then you should use a task. > The problem (maybe a mental one) is than one would say - what a > monster for such a simple thing! A second task and a rendezvous does seem a little large. That's why the controlled-object-critical-region idiom is often preferred.