From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,85034d1ac78a66eb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-23 19:48:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Operating System
Date: 23 Mar 2002 21:47:25 -0600
Organization: Berbee Information Networks Corporation
Message-ID: <I9nPMrbg2e5n@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <a62kmf$giv$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <o2td8ug1chantij2e6j80kk56mrafp6e78@4ax.com> <a6825a$75c$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3C88E0D1.89161C16@despammed.com> <a6m8h5$rpb$1@helle.btinternet.com>
 <a6nld6$i4n$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <jgo59u49ro74pbfvoek6ruqqa5o790mq90@4ax.com>
 <wcc8z8se0oe.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <v30a9usnp895obfnu6ef8t9h6nnn9fkp1r@4ax.com> <3C9514DD.9CF1F84A@san.rr.com>
 <99da9u0909rsblfdcc1ru7jd2r9q461qhk@4ax.com>
 <a76lbh$8i42@news.cis.okstate.edu>
 <436o9uc7jg590rv5rb1l9v6be8vk49s278@4ax.com> <slrna9ou09.Organization: LJK
 Software
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1016941667 16388 192.135.80.34 (24 Mar 2002
 03:47:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 03:47:47 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21601
Date: 2002-03-23T21:47:25-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <slrna9ou09.21m.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>, Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> writes:
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 00:06:58 -0600, James Ross wrote:
>> I'll agree with that to a point.  A very secure OS should have an
>> "unsafe" mode where all bets are off -- do whatever you want. However,
>> under normal conditions no foot wounding allowed. 
> 
> How can it the be a secure OS if half the applications you are using are
> unsecure? 

That is why not all applications have access to inner mode.  They can
only harm data to which their own user has access.