From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d69f4a8070dd707
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-30 23:34:17 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!news2.e.nsc.no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" <tarjei@online.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <3ED83712.8090905@cogeco.ca>
Subject: Re: Ada.Networks.Sockets hierarchy for standardization?
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <I1YBa.16967$8g5.284637@news2.e.nsc.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.67.226.245
X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@telenor.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 08:34:16 MEST
X-Trace: news2.ulv.nextra.no 1054362856 130.67.226.245
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 08:33:54 +0200
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38177
Date: 2003-05-31T08:33:54+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Warren W. Gay wrote:
> For discussion: I have thrown together this evening
> a more formalized view of some "chicken scratching" I did on my
> train commute home this evening. The diagram is available at my
> web site (see PDF link further on).

First impressions is "not so bad".

However I would re-arrange. I would make sockets the top level node and
arrange everything around that (forget about the ada node; this is Ada.

I would change some names. e.g. streams should be protocols, protocols
should be transport (or something like that).

Anyway, I'm worried that the network programming might drown in a ocean of
packages.

greetings,