From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2508dabb4f373c09 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Subject: Re: GNAT for MacOS X Server? Date: 1999/06/19 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 491412579 References: <19990525113333.23697.00004914@ng-ci1.aol.com> <374E9FE4.7463E137@ionet.net> <310519991513483851%hopperj@macconnect.com> X-Trace: typhoon.nyu.edu 929797351 128.122.140.194 (Sat, 19 Jun 1999 09:02:31 EDT) Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 09:02:31 EDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-06-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <310519991513483851%hopperj@macconnect.com> "James E. Hopper" writes: >bad, currently gcc is 2.7.2 >better, beta i am told by folks within apple is using egcc My understanding is that the version of EGCS being used at present is quite old, so the news isn't as good as you might think. It will probably be quite tricky to get a reliable GNAT running on that version. Precisely what version of GCC/EGCS will be used in the final MacOS X release is far from clear at this point.