From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,f41f1f25333fa601
X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3ca574fc2007430
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Chris Hills <chris@phaedsys.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Ada and Automotive Industry
Date: 1996/12/02
Message-ID: <HtgbhGAHr1oyEwD5@phaedsys.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 202126566
distribution: world
x-nntp-posting-host: phaedsys.demon.co.uk
references: <55ea3g$m1j@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <dewar.849073914@merv>
organization: Phaedrus Systems
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime
Date: 1996-12-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <E1szLH.3Mq@world.std.com>, Robert A Duff
<bobduff@world.std.com> writes
>In article <BPE6pDAXsXoyEwAm@phaedsys.demon.co.uk>,
>Chris Hills  <chris@phaedsys.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>I believe that at the current time there are nearly 2000 requests for
>>clarification on the ADA standard. This is 2000 places where

>I am amused by the number "2000".  There are, in fact, 174 "Ada Issues",
>which are the rulings, or pending rulings, on the current Ada standard.
>Of these, 69 are considered bugs in the Standard document.  (Others are
>editorial comments, cases where the question has an obvious answer, and
>so forth).
>
>The Ada Issues are publicly available from sw-eng.falls-church.va.us.
>
>- Bob

Many thanks for the correction. THe 2k was a figure "some while ago".  

I think the major problem in this world is not the languages as such but
the way they are used or often misused :-)


Regards

        Chris

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\  Chris Hills,Tamworth Staffs /\/\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ B77 5PG England  /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/