From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,58253cbf46bbb1fc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s22.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Automated conversion to C++? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s22 1203182119 12.201.97.213 (Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:15:19 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:15:19 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:15:19 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19825 Date: 2008-02-16T17:15:19+00:00 List-Id: Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: > > It is good enough with POSIX dependent C++ code. And I don't plan to > do anything which depends critically on the more detailed requirements > on Ada tasking (a "pthreads" based solution is likely to be good > enough). Then you don't really want an Ada-to-C++ translator, but an Ada-to-C++-and-Posix translator. That's a different, simpler, and possible creature. -- Jeff Carter "Apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?" Monty Python's Life of Brian 80