From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1563af5c167aacf2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-25 17:24:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!207.115.63.138!newscon04.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr13.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!3bae8248!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: thick? thin? binding References: <200620022129217771%demery@cox.rr.com> X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.112.201.202 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr13.news.prodigy.com 1025050983 ST000 67.112.201.202 (Tue, 25 Jun 2002 20:23:03 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 20:23:03 EDT Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com X-UserInfo1: [[PAPDCAO@SIRQ@[ORHD]_\@VR]^@B@MCPWZKB]MPXHJUZ]CDVW[AKK[J\]^HVKHG^EWZHBLO^[\NH_AZFWGN^\DHNVMX_DHHX[FSQKBOTS@@BP^]C@RHS_AGDDC[AJM_T[GZNRNZAY]GNCPBDYKOLK^_CZFWPGHZIXW@C[AFKBBQS@E@DAZ]VDFUNTQQ]FN Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 00:23:03 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26703 Date: 2002-06-26T00:23:03+00:00 List-Id: > Although I'm certainly biased, I still think that the best discussion > on the issues associated with Ada bindings is the rationale in > IEEE Std 1003.5.... We stole, er, learned from, the POSIX standard for the development of CLAW. Sincerest form of flattery and all. ;)