From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fdb77,564174f9610b9ca X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b6de2fa4828c91e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,4b6de2fa4828c91e X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-30 00:55:06 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!server3.netnews.ja.net!south.jnrs.ja.net!server2.netnews.ja.net!bath.ac.uk!unknown From: Tim Tyler Subject: Re: Is Microsoft de-emphasizing C# ? User-Agent: tin/1.4.3-20000502 ("Marian") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.17-grsec-1.9.3a (i686)) Reply-To: tim@tt1.org Sender: unknown@bits.bris.ac.uk (Address not verified) Organization: University of Bristol, UK Message-ID: References: <3EAAC29B.4050700@prodigy.net> <8900o-4qh.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net> <3EAF305F.D100B5F8@adaworks.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:46:14 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:62921 comp.lang.ada:36755 comp.lang.fortran:36487 Date: 2003-04-30T07:46:14+00:00 List-Id: In comp.lang.java.advocacy Richard Riehle wrote: : Kent Paul Dolan wrote: :> Well, at least Ada compiles into Java bytecode as well, in at :> least one commercial compiler. : Which compiler supports the current JVM? JGNAT no longer : does. Is the Aonix compiler up-to-date for the current JVM? That shouldn't make much difference - since the bytecode from Java 1.02 still runs fine on the latest JVMs. -- __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@tt1.org