From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a88e582de42cdc9b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s22.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@acm.nospam.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Access type (mis)use (Was: Bug in Ada (SuSe 10.2) ?)
References: 
 <0_mdna0iHpIsCifaRVnzvQA@telenor.com><47ba9867$0$21892$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi><dN2dndl3zoW5Oifa4p2dnAA@telenor.com><dbe54d78-5bd2-4ad0-ab93-f00b099ae5a3@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com><spCdnTyCKpCfvSHaRVnzvQA@telenor.com><3a281192-2744-4110-9fc1-90c155c9436b@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com><qm_uj.42460$yE1.36921@attbi_s21><48277611-402f-4622-be05-6edddf6dd56a@o10g2000hsf.googlegroups.com><fpigq5$5me$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <gcejpf.ir2.ln@hunter.axlog.fr><624tcvF21i3nvU1@mid.individual.net><2630d99b-1578-4d79-ac9c-64c00c203b77@e60g2000hsh.googlegroups.com><c8a646bf-47b0-43e6-ae46-d5f820126b07@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
 <ygefxvmv6ir.fsf_-_@hugsarin.dmusyd.edu> <Sskvj.16399$k_4.3269@trnddc04>
In-Reply-To: <Sskvj.16399$k_4.3269@trnddc04>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <H%lvj.43831$9j6.7242@attbi_s22>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com
X-Trace: attbi_s22 1203629159 12.201.97.213 (Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:25:59 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:25:59 GMT
Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:25:59 GMT
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19951
Date: 2008-02-21T21:25:59+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Bob Klungle wrote:
> 
> For what it is worth, cygwin gnatmake 3.4.4 yields
> 9
> 11

That might depend on the compiler and optimization level. A good optimizer might 
indicate that the 2nd procedure does nothing with its variable, and eliminate 
it. It might even be able to see that the 2nd procedure does nothing, and 
eliminate the call to it.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Beyond 100,000 lines of code you
should probably be coding in Ada."
P. J. Plauger
26