From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b0f7b966bf5d7b74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: anon@anon.org (anon) Subject: Re: File rename in Ada95 Reply-To: no to spamers (No@email.given.org) References: <373c802c-8914-4bb8-9417-9d2c9f905189@a29g2000pra.googlegroups.com> X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 09:39:50 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.65.144.177 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1225618790 12.65.144.177 (Sun, 02 Nov 2008 09:39:50 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 09:39:50 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2554 Date: 2008-11-02T09:39:50+00:00 List-Id: Ludovic Brenta, Until you and your team of Ada supporters at least get "Polyorb" and/or GLADE up and running under the latest GNAT/gcc. You should bypass reading this forum. And the fix to those packages are easy. And as for Duff. If he re-read the initial post of this thread Duff would see that Maciej Sobczak stated his version of Ada does not have Ada.Directories which make Duff post a foolish post or may be Robert Duff need to update his glasses so he can read the post! Because this is not the first post that Duff has assume that all GNAT users are using the latest GNAT version. There are some that still ask questions that deals with Ada 95 only systems, like DOS users to name one type. Also some users want to follow the strict guidelines of the RM and not add vendors extensions to the RM or mix Ada specs. And as for Simon, that comment has been there in every version of GNAT from 2005 though 2008. And until 2008 version, when Adacore finally removed the "pragma Ada_05;" statement that comment was meanless. And if you check most packages of GNAT you will find a lot of meanless comments. Also, downloaded and check Nov 1, 2008. gnat-gpl-2007-src.tgz -- has the "pragma Ada_05;" gnat-gpl-2008-src.tgz -- the "pragma Ada_05;" has been removed. And just like some people are still using XP there are people who are still using GNAT-GPL-2007 or using GNAT-3.15. One reason is Annex E. So, do not assume that all GNAT users are using GNAT 2008, and this goes duuble, especially when they say "Ada95" in the title. In <373c802c-8914-4bb8-9417-9d2c9f905189@a29g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, Ludovic Brenta writes: >anon wrote in a reply to Bob Duff: >> Plus recheck your copy, it depend upon where you get your copy of GNAT, >> if it has been modified. The version I was speaking of was downloaded >> from Adacore web site in Aug 2008. > >Anon, once again you made a fool of yourself in public. Bob Duff works >for AdaCore. He knows better than you do. > >-- >Ludovic Brenta.