From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ba6120170d8e7faf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-05 07:53:42 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer.radix.net!uunet!ash.uu.net!xyzzy!nntp From: "Jeffrey L. Susanj" Subject: Re: Worst Case Execution Time Tool? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: p2005079.mw.nos.boeing.com Message-ID: X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Sender: nntp@news.boeing.com (Boeing NNTP News Access) Organization: The Boeing Company X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 References: <3C0D536C.2E059EE8@computer.org> <3C0E3535.58437022@computer.org> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 15:31:10 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17449 Date: 2001-12-05T15:31:10+00:00 List-Id: What we have always done is select a scenario that looks like it would produce the worst case time and run the software on the bench. The executive can capture the time the frame ends. Not very elegant and not very rigorous but it gives us a warm fuzzy feeling. Jeff S. "StationSteve" wrote in message news:3C0E3535.58437022@computer.org... > ... > > Guess the marketing guys got tricky again, eh? ;-) > > So how (or do?) people typically PROVE that their program will actually meet their deadlines? If > somebody does a rate monotonic design, they have to assume the execution time of task. How does one > determine the true execution time so that the design can be shown to be correct? > > Thanks again... > > Rod Chapman wrote: >