From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e36020a4e7d24836 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!cyclone01.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe06.ams2.POSTED!1cdbf9d3!not-for-mail From: Per Sandberg Reply-To: per.sandberg@bredband.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to leave .ali files in original library? References: <87zkp4uhjl.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@WWWSpace.NET NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:42:46 UTC Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:42:44 +0100 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19029 Date: 2011-03-10T19:42:44+01:00 List-Id: I dropped emacs and "emacs Ada-mode" several years ago and the main reason was that that environment where only toys compared to the power of the .gpr-files in combination with GPS. However on win32 I count: "notepad" as a great editor to write 2 line batch scripts in and ".bat" as a great language as long as the file is less then 5 lines. I think emacs is great in a much larger scope and it is a very powerful tool. But when the task is to produce larger systems in Ada, I haven't seen anything that is even comparable with the combination .gpr-files and GPS, and it works fine for "hello_world" as well. /Per On 03/10/2011 10:36 AM, localhost@example.org wrote: > On 2011-03-10, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> localhost@example.org wrote on comp.lang.ada: >>> Thanks...I would like to avoid using project files >> >> Why? > > One less thing to learn, if emacs Ada-mode gets the job done (so far!) I try > to avoid learning non-transferable bits as much as I can. > >>> but I haven't worked on a big Ada project yet so I don't know if it's >> possible. >> >> You can use project files on small projects, too. They are very nice. > > I'll see how it goes as I get further along with Ada. Thanks for your help! >