From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a644fa9cd1a3869a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-10 08:08:42 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: List container strawman 1.2 Date: 10 Nov 2001 10:08:38 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3BECA3B7.5020702@telepath.com> <9sjf4n$odm$1@news.huji.ac.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1005408521 3426 192.135.80.34 (10 Nov 2001 16:08:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 16:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16218 Date: 2001-11-10T10:08:38-06:00 List-Id: In article <9sjf4n$odm$1@news.huji.ac.il>, "Ehud Lamm" writes: > Ted, > > If I am seeing correctly we are still stuck with the library level > instantiation bussiness. > I must say that it seems to me that I'd rather ditch the Controlled type, > and remove this obstacle. > > Don't others detest this as much as I do? I prefer a Controlled type.