From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac02560f0af03a21 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-01 20:09:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny01.gnilink.net.POSTED!0e8a908a!not-for-mail From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? References: <1072458199.346049@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3fec7c21$0$4764$61fed72c@news.rcn.com> <4iBIb.8173$qS3.498@nwrdny03.gnilink.net> <1072883131.278899@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1072891494.595791@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1072899508.453543@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1072906542.723974@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3ff38b16$0$4759$61fed72c@news.rcn.com> <3ff44baf$0$4754$61fed72c@news.rcn.com> <3ff4ba22$0$4761$61fed72c@news.rcn.com> In-Reply-To: <3ff4ba22$0$4761$61fed72c@news.rcn.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 04:09:10 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.84.192.162 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny01.gnilink.net 1073016550 162.84.192.162 (Thu, 01 Jan 2004 23:09:10 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 23:09:10 EST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4035 Date: 2004-01-02T04:09:10+00:00 List-Id: Frank J. Lhota wrote: > Yes, but what about the callee? What *about* the calee? It sees the arguments the same way, with the first at the top of the stack and the others lower down. Come on, work it out for yourself. There's no difference between pushing from right to left, or reserving space then filling from left to right. The resulting picture in memory is the same.