From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,75c440b4b7ed5f91 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: anon@anon.org (anon) Subject: Re: Ada coding standards, was: Re: Real Time IO routines Reply-To: anon@anon.org (anon) References: <1193410739.367181.96050@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <87hckbeajm.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <8BdoH$LrdKPe@eisner.encompasserve.org> X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:02:13 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.65.204.69 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1193853733 12.65.204.69 (Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:02:13 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:02:13 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2682 Date: 2007-10-31T18:02:13+00:00 List-Id: It seams that the paper is filled wilth errors. 1. The standard is wriiten for another company which may or may not be apart of NASA. So is this the true NASA standards? 2. We all know that the ISO adopted the Ada 2005 aka Ada 2007 standards back in Jan 2007. The NASA coding standard is dated in July, 2007 and stated that the ISO has not adopted the Ada 2005 standards. So, either this is an error or the paper is just a redated older standard. 3. In 2004 SGI installed a 512 CPU super computer for NASA that uses LINUX and Ada (Ada 95, SGI version). The paper would have touch on that issue as well. But the only Ada vendor that the paper talked about was GNAT and Ada 2005. NASA uses almost every software and hardware vendor out there. So, any standard would acknowledge this and state issues with each vendor and their implementation of Ada and other languages. This paper only uses talks about GNAT and Ada 2005. And with Congress and the President watching NASA closely. There are too many questions or errors in this coding Standard for me to think that this is the Standard for NASA coding. In <8BdoH$LrdKPe@eisner.encompasserve.org>, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP (Simon Clubley) writes: >In article , Jean-Pierre Rosen writes: >> Simon Clubley a �crit : >>> In article <87hckbeajm.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>, Ludovic Brenta writes: >> >>> I'd be interested in seeing what other Ada features are not allowed in >>> your code as well as what other recommendations that your standard >>> might make. >> >> FYI, NASA rules are available at >> http://fsw.gsfc.nasa.gov/gds/code_standards_ada.pdf >> > >Thanks. > >IIRC, the last time I was pointed to this, I was told that the other NASA >standards are not available. Does anyone know if that's still the case ? > >> And of course, if you want ideas about coding rules, you are welcome to >> read the AdaControl user's guide at >> http://www.adalog.fr/compo/adacontrol_ug.html >> > >Interesting software (and something that I should really try out.) > >Simon. > >-- >Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP >Microsoft: Bringing you 1980's technology to a 21st century world