From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f849b,b8d52151b7b306d2 X-Google-Attributes: gidf849b,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00006d3c4735d70 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-24 12:50:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer2.atl.newshosting.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!colt.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!phaedsys.demon.co.uk!chris From: Chris Hills Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 20:41:41 +0000 Organization: Phaedrus Systems Message-ID: References: <3fe00b82.90228601@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <3FE026A8.3CD6A3A@yahoo.com> <3bf1uvg2ntadvahfud2rg6ujk24sora6gr@4ax.com> <2u3auvogde8ktotlaq0ldiaska3g416gus@4ax.com> <20619edc.0312221020.3fd1b4ee@posting.google.com> <20619edc.0312222106.3b369547@posting.google.com> <45cs9hAbLc6$EAAx@phaedsys.demon.co.uk> <3fe9f0d7.104475725@News.CIS.DFN.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: phaedsys.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1072299054 8752 80.176.226.26 (24 Dec 2003 20:50:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 20:50:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 M <7y9ouFdz6gbBVVTek6rkWKl0do> Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.arch.embedded:6078 comp.lang.ada:3789 Date: 2003-12-24T20:41:41+00:00 List-Id: In article <3fe9f0d7.104475725@News.CIS.DFN.DE>, Dave Hansen writes >On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:46:19 +0000, Chris Hills >wrote: > >[...] >> >>PASCAL and Mod2 are mentioned but you will be hard pressed to find tool >>for these for many targets. BTW is there ADA for the PIC, AVR and 8015? > >Nit: it's "Pascal," "Modula-2," and "Ada." > >The PIC I doubt. I'm hard-pressed to consider some of the "C" >compilers for PIC to be C. :-) I know what you mean. >The AVR is supported by GCC, GCC is not usually suitable for 8 and 16 bit embedded systems. IT is a generic compiler system that is not usually a patch onthe commercial ones.. > so GNAT might work, though the runtime >support probably isn't there. I haven't tried it in any case. > >The 8015 I've never heard of. I assume you mean 8051, to which I'd >have to say I haven't heard of one, yes.... though some one will now tell us about the 8015 from 197* that was around for 2.3 years :-) >though there is a Modula-2 >compiler. But is it any good? I once had to work on an embedded system using Mod2 a none of the compilers supported the basic language in the same way. Let alone extensions. It turned out that the most stable compiler was the least standard :-( A theoretically good language is no use at all if the compiler implementations are no good. At least with C there will usually be several commercial compilers and a multitude of testing and checking tools. It's one thing having a compiler but what about the rest. How many ICE support ADA? Regards Chris /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/\ /\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/