From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-30 03:36:38 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-feed.riddles.org.uk!news.ticon.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X Date: 30 May 2003 05:36:36 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com> <3ED41344.7090105@spam.com> <3ED46D81.FF62C34F@0.0> <3ED46E07.4340CABC@0.0> <3ED4F3FD.A0EF7079@alfred-hilscher.de> <3ED4ECFC.5060000@cogeco.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1054290914 1032 192.135.80.34 (30 May 2003 10:35:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 10:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38070 Date: 2003-05-30T05:36:36-05:00 List-Id: In article , Lutz Donnerhacke writes: > * Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> So, let's make all types "tagged"! I think it could be done little or no >> compatibility impact. > > What about the representation clauses? If you do not use Ada for system > programming, don't try to make Ada200x unusable for this purpose. Let's allow representation clause support for the tags and tagged types ! (That is _not_ a comment in support of making all types tagged.)