From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e55ee29fd922b5bc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jerry@jvdsys.stuyts.nl Subject: Re: Interfacing to void * Date: 1999/07/20 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 503318716 Sender: jerry@stuyts.nl (Jerry van Dijk) References: <37929901.649C0955@worldnet.att.net> <379412E4.9B0E98CF@worldnet.att.net> Organization: * JerryWare HQ *, Leiden, Holland User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980226 (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.10 (i586)) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-07-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: William Starner wrote: : I fear that many : bugs are going to appear the first time this gets compiled on a non-GNAT : compiler, with stuff like that (as GNAT uses C convention for almost everything : by default.) a) No, pragma Convention C and Interfaces.C are both standard Ada. b) GNAT, being part of the gcc suite, makes a point of have the basic types laid out like the equivalent C types, where appropriate. But this does _not_ mean that GNAT is somehow using a C convention for its basic types. -- -- Jerry van Dijk | Leiden, Holland -- Team Ada | jdijk@acm.org -- see http://stad.dsl.nl/~jvandyk