From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,959627a08fbc77c5 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,30a9bb3017fa58dd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) Subject: Re: EGCS & GNAT Was (Re: GNAT versions) Date: 1999/05/04 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 474121855 References: <3718ccb6.3581307@news.mindspring.com> <7g0qj1$1td0$1@Mercury.mcs.net> <1999Apr26.074128.1@eisner> <7g2798$ntf$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1999-05-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7g2798$ntf$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, Robert Dewar wrote: >In article <1999Apr26.074128.1@eisner>, >But more to the point, the great majority of our ongoing >development effort relates to new features, new tools, >new packages, improved performance etc. I have a question, will ACT be able to help with the egcs community, and help us integrate in teh Ada frontend into egcs, or do we have to go it alone? I personally would like to see Ada and Pascal integrated, tested (to some extent), and then egcs released as gcc 3.0.