From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fceb4e36ba4d570f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-25 06:48:49 PST Path: newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!feed.textport.net!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <3AE3A5BD.C0601A95@home.com> Subject: Re: ada95 and uml Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:48:21 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:48:21 GMT Xref: newsfeed.google.com comp.lang.ada:6924 Date: 2001-04-25T13:48:21+00:00 List-Id: In article , Ken Garlington says... > >"Simon Wright" wrote in message >news:x7vsnj0go62.fsf@smaug.pushface.org... > >: What you can't reasonably expect to do is to take the result of such a >: code-generation, change it, and round-trip back to the model. No great >: loss (IMO). > >There aren't tools for doing round-trip engineering between UML and Ada? I've used one. It sucked. Going out to Ada wasn't too bad, but going back into UML was a disaster. As an example, it made a UML class out of every single enumeration value! --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com