From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3c37d6ac44550e08 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) Subject: Re: ??? Help!: how to do unconstraned arrays/records??? Date: 1998/11/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 409096220 Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com (USENET news) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: houdini.camb.inmet.com References: <36430C81.F9D3A26E@elca-matrix.ch> Organization: Intermetrics, Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-11-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Mats Weber (Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch) wrote: : > In the above example, you would certainly want a : > "pragma Elaborate(Parameters);" after the "with Parameters;" clause : > on the package with this host/node data structure, to minimize the : > chance of a Program_Error due to an elaboration order problem. : Probably "pragma Elaborate_All(Parameters);" would be safer, in case : Parameters depends on stuff that needs to be elaborated. Almost all uses : of pragma Elaborate should be replaced by Elaborate_All, I think. True, but pragma Elaborate_All is defined only in Ada 95, and the user's current development environment is Ada 83. -- -Tucker Taft stt@inmet.com http://www.inmet.com/~stt/ Intermetrics, Inc. Burlington, MA USA An AverStar Company