From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b06f8f15f01a568 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: doylep@ecf.toronto.edu (Patrick Doyle) Subject: Re: Software landmines (loops) Date: 1998/10/10 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 399634778 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: skule.ecf Sender: news@ecf.toronto.edu (News Administrator) References: <35cb8058.645630787@news.ne.mediaone.net> <35DBDD24.D003404D@calfp.co.uk> Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-10-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <1dghyt5.oik1lzhxzf2N@n207167116176.inetworld.net>, Charles H. Sampson wrote: > >In my entire career I have rarely written the following construct: > > > > end loop > >Actually, I can't remember ever doing it, but I assume that I must have >at least a few times. Eh? How can you write a serious loop without calling a procedure from inside it? Do I misunderstand what you wrote? -PD -- -- Patrick Doyle doylep@ecf.toronto.edu