comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft)
Subject: Re: Boolean Representation
Date: 1998/09/26
Date: 1998-09-26T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ezw8Et.57H.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: yecemt0kp9f.fsf@king.cts.com

Keith Thompson (kst@king.cts.com) wrote:

: ...
: Here's another interesting question.  Suppose some perverse
: implementation used an internal representation of (False => 1, True => 0)
: for type Boolean, and generated extra code to make all the predefined
: operations work properly.  A packed array of 32 Booleans, for example,
: would occupy 32 bits, but setting it to (others => True) would clear
: all 32 bits.  I'm not suggesting that this would ever be a good idea,
: but would it actually violate the RM?

It is just this kind of thinking which led people to put "reconfirming"
representation clauses on enumeration types in Ada 83.  What a waste
of energy!  We added a rule in Ada 95 to save the paranoid from
writing all those silly enumeration representation clauses.  I can
see we should have gone one step further, specifying the representation
for 1-bit boolean objects.  Groan.

Please paranoid readers, don't go worrying about the possibility of
1-bit boolean objects having False = 1.  Instead, let's all agree
to shun any Ada compiler which makes such an absurd choice...  That's 
ultimately much more effective than any words in a standard.

: -- 
: Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst> <*>
: Qualcomm, San Diego, California, USA  <http://www.qualcomm.com>

--
-Tucker Taft   stt@inmet.com   http://www.inmet.com/~stt/
Intermetrics, Inc.  Burlington, MA  USA
An AverStar Company




  reply	other threads:[~1998-09-26  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-09-24  0:00 Boolean Representation matthew_snyder
1998-09-24  0:00 ` dennison
1998-09-24  0:00   ` Keith Thompson
1998-09-25  0:00     ` dennison
1998-09-25  0:00       ` Keith Thompson
1998-09-26  0:00         ` Tucker Taft [this message]
1998-09-26  0:00           ` Keith Thompson
1998-09-27  0:00             ` null pointer representation (was: Boolean Representation) Arthur Evans Jr
1998-09-27  0:00               ` Keith Thompson
1998-09-28  0:00               ` dewarr
1998-09-28  0:00                 ` Keith Thompson
1998-09-28  0:00                   ` dewarr
1998-09-30  0:00                     ` Keith Thompson
1998-10-02  0:00                       ` Robert I. Eachus
1998-09-28  0:00                 ` Lieven Marchand
1998-09-27  0:00             ` Boolean Representation dewarr
1998-09-27  0:00           ` dewarr
1998-09-24  0:00 ` dewarr
1998-09-24  0:00   ` Samuel T. Harris
1998-09-25  0:00     ` dewarr
1998-09-27  0:00       ` Samuel T. Harris
1998-09-28  0:00         ` dewar
1998-09-24  0:00   ` matthew_snyder
1998-09-24  0:00     ` dennison
1998-09-24  0:00     ` Tom Moran
1998-09-25  0:00       ` dewarr
1998-09-25  0:00         ` Tom Moran
1998-09-25  0:00     ` Robert I. Eachus
1998-09-25  0:00     ` dewarr
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-09-24  0:00 matthew_snyder
1998-09-25  0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1998-09-25  0:00   ` dewarr
1998-09-25  0:00   ` dewarr
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox