From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b06f8f15f01a568
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
From: doylep@ecf.toronto.edu (Patrick Doyle)
Subject: Re: Software landmines (loops)
Date: 1998/09/07
Message-ID: <Eyx023.IC8@ecf.toronto.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 388681493
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: spark23.ecf
Sender: news@ecf.toronto.edu (News Administrator)
References: <6rf59b$2ud$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <m31zpq4pim.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
 <905134925.147581@iris.nyx.net> <35f34bbd.7903825@news.erols.com>
Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-09-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <35f34bbd.7903825@news.erols.com>, Ell <ell@access.digex.net> wrote:
>rgardner@nyx.net (Ray Gardner) wrote:
>
>>.... Of course my main point was 
>>that the founder(s) of SP did limit the control structures to 
>>single-entry / single-exit structures, and that still stands.
>
>And your proof is what?

Can you prove they recommended using other structures?

 -PD

-- 
--
Patrick Doyle
doylep@ecf.toronto.edu