From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9fb7299100a4c4db X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) Subject: Re: Abstract realizations can't be inherited?? Date: 1998/08/31 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 386437932 Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com (USENET news) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: houdini.camb.inmet.com References: <6se8fs$7lt$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Organization: Intermetrics, Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-08-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: dennison@telepath.com wrote: : In article , : stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) wrote: : > This sounds like a compiler bug. If a type is non-abstract, then by : > defintion all of its primitive procedures are non-abstract, even : > if an overriding is done in the private part. : > : > Time to file a bug report... : Awwww, again? :-) : I know I really should take Tucker's word for this, but I'd appreciate it if : someone would compile this example w/ a non-Aonix compiler and see if they get : an error. I'd hate to send in a bug report reading, "Tucker Taft says this is : wrong". Luckily, the response can also be "this bug has just been fixed by TT" ;-). : -- : T.E.D. -- -Tucker Taft stt@inmet.com http://www.inmet.com/~stt/ Intermetrics, Inc. Burlington, MA USA