From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,56dbd715fa74735a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jerry@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl (Jerry van Dijk)
Subject: Re: Mutually dependent private types
Date: 1998/05/27
Message-ID: <EtLsGH.5x@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 357059898
References: <6k25ra$6j7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <356B6D65.BD34E3EF@ac3i.dseg.ti.com>
Organization: * JerryWare *, Leiden, Holland
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-05-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


John Volan (johnv@ac3i.dseg.ti.com) wrote:

[...]

: software objects.  Software objects shouldn't be grab-bags of irrelevant
: domain information, they should be encapsulations of the actual
: responsibilities of an actual target system.

[...]

: "office".  For instance, let's say we can assign an office to an
: employee, for use as that employee's everyday workspace.  For every
: office we keep track of the assigned employee, and for every employee,
: we keep track of the assigned office.  But an assigned employee has to

So perhaps you just found a new class:

	Office_Employee_List

:-)

Jerry.

-- 
-- Jerry van Dijk  | email: jdijk@acm.org
-- Leiden, Holland | member Team-Ada