From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a85dd10bdbdb69d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-10 07:08:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "John Cupak" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: Giving a package specification access to the private types of another package X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.31.64.136 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net 1039532900 66.31.64.136 (Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:08:20 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:08:20 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:08:20 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31642 Date: 2002-12-10T15:08:20+00:00 List-Id: What about using a private package? John "Steven Murdoch" wrote in message news:at4unv$m2r$4@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk... > In article , > "Grein, Christoph" writes: > >A private child's spec can see in the private part of its parent. > > This was the case I needed, making the spec private fixed my problem. > > Thank you, > Steven Murdoch.