From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b807da453e88972
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jerry@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl (Jerry van Dijk)
Subject: Re: Function Pointers
Date: 1998/04/16
Message-ID: <ErHGu8.CB@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 344764359
References: <353257CC.211B84EE@phaseiv.com>
 <ErEsxx.9F@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl> <dewar.892641366@merv>
Organization: * JerryWare *, Leiden, Holland
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-04-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar (dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu) wrote:

: Jerry said

: <<-- As GNAT allows only one compilation unit in a file
: --  we nest the functions within main;
: >>

: Surely a bad reason for doing anything. It is bad practice (see for example
: AQ&S) generally to put more than one compilation unit in a file anyway.

Agreed. I was just being lazy.

-- 
-- Jerry van Dijk  | email: jdijk@acm.org
-- Leiden, Holland | member Team-Ada